Discussion:
NICDEF Question- a little courious is all
(too old to reply)
Huegel, Thomas
2006-03-07 16:59:39 UTC
Permalink
I used a NICDEF directory statement very similiar to the example below from
the CP Planning and Admin guide. The VSWITCH is defined in the SYSTEM CONFIG
file I do not have a MODIFY VSWITCH GRANT statement for this user. When the
user logs on I get an error saying he is not authorized to couple to the
VSWITCH. I know it is easy enough to fix that with the SET VSWITCH command,
but I was under the impression that this was not necessary if the NICDEF was
used in the directory (even without a MODIFY VSWITCH GRANT), as opposed to a
DEFINE VSWITCH command.

Did I miss something or are the old brain cells in need of a PTF or two?



Define a simulated QDIO adapter using I/O devices 0500-0507 (eight devices)
which will be coupled to the SYSTEM-owned INEWS LAN during LOGON processing:




NICDEF 500 TYPE QDIO DEV 8 LAN SYSTEM INEWS



__________________________________________________________________
<< ella for Spam Control >> has removed VSE-List messages and set aside
VM-List for me
You can use it too - and it's FREE! http://www.ellaforspam.com
David Kreuter
2006-03-07 18:05:46 UTC
Permalink
VSWITCHes are always protected, even with a NICDEF directory card.
David


-----Original Message-----
From: VM/ESA and z/VM Discussions on behalf of Huegel, Thomas
Sent: Tue 3/7/2006 11:59 AM
To: VMESA-***@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: NICDEF Question- a little courious is all


I used a NICDEF directory statement very similiar to the example below from
the CP Planning and Admin guide. The VSWITCH is defined in the SYSTEM CONFIG
file I do not have a MODIFY VSWITCH GRANT statement for this user. When the
user logs on I get an error saying he is not authorized to couple to the
VSWITCH. I know it is easy enough to fix that with the SET VSWITCH command,
but I was under the impression that this was not necessary if the NICDEF was
used in the directory (even without a MODIFY VSWITCH GRANT), as opposed to a
DEFINE VSWITCH command.

Did I miss something or are the old brain cells in need of a PTF or two?



Define a simulated QDIO adapter using I/O devices 0500-0507 (eight devices)
which will be coupled to the SYSTEM-owned INEWS LAN during LOGON processing:




NICDEF 500 TYPE QDIO DEV 8 LAN SYSTEM INEWS



__________________________________________________________________
<< ella for Spam Control >> has removed VSE-List messages and set aside
VM-List for me
You can use it too - and it's FREE! http://www.ellaforspam.com
Brian Nielsen
2006-03-07 20:38:51 UTC
Permalink
You can do the GRANT with either MODIFY VSWITCH in SYSTEM CONFIG or with
SET VSWITCH GRANT in AUTOLOG1's PROFILE EXEC beofre the guests are
XAUTOLOGGED.

Brian Nielsen


On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 14:02:34 -0600, David Booher <***@quest.com>
wrote:

>So how to most people grant the privilege for the other guests before
>they are XAUTOLOGGED?
>
>Dave Booher
>Quest Software
Rich Smrcina
2006-03-08 05:51:51 UTC
Permalink
AUTOLOG1's PROFILE EXEC or an exec run from AUTOLOG1's PROFILE EXEC.

David Booher wrote:
> So how to most people grant the privilege for the other guests before
> they are XAUTOLOGGED?
>
> Dave Booher
> Quest Software
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* VM/ESA and z/VM Discussions [mailto:VMESA-***@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU]
> *On Behalf Of *David Kreuter
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 07, 2006 12:06 PM
> *To:* VMESA-***@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> *Subject:* Re: NICDEF Question- a little courious is all
>
> VSWITCHes are always protected, even with a NICDEF directory card.
> David
>
>

--
Rich Smrcina
VM Assist, Inc.
Main: (262)392-2026
Cell: (414)491-6001
Ans Service: (360)715-2467
rich.smrcina at vmassist.com

Catch the WAVV! http://www.wavv.org
WAVV 2006 - Chattanooga, TN - April 7-11, 2006
Loading...