Thomas Kern
2006-01-25 13:55:02 UTC
The background for this is that we run a z890 with two LPARs on the CP side.
We have real ESCON CTCs between these two LPARS for GRS between z/OS.e and
z/OS. Both of these z/OS(.e) systems are at the 1.6 level. The z/OS system
is a guest under z/VM 5.1. We have just found out that our Disaster Recovery
vendor does not have any hardware that will support z/OS.e.
We are looking at the possibility of running two z/OS guests under z/VM in a
single LPAR. We could then use virtual CTCs between these two guests for GRS.
Does z/VM's support/emulation of CTC's allow for "GRS in a ring
configuration without sysplex"? In the real I/O configuration this requires
BCTC definitions.
/Tom Kern
/301-903-2211
We have real ESCON CTCs between these two LPARS for GRS between z/OS.e and
z/OS. Both of these z/OS(.e) systems are at the 1.6 level. The z/OS system
is a guest under z/VM 5.1. We have just found out that our Disaster Recovery
vendor does not have any hardware that will support z/OS.e.
We are looking at the possibility of running two z/OS guests under z/VM in a
single LPAR. We could then use virtual CTCs between these two guests for GRS.
Does z/VM's support/emulation of CTC's allow for "GRS in a ring
configuration without sysplex"? In the real I/O configuration this requires
BCTC definitions.
/Tom Kern
/301-903-2211